On Alternatives to Google Reader

If you read my blog you know I am completely distraught by apple getting rid of Google Reader, and have been busy trying out alternatives, but am still unhappy with any of them, and have just been using Google Reader while I can, and especially REEDER for the Mac, iPhone and iPad. Hopefully it will either get a way to sync via icloud or use a backend that will let it continue to work as it currently does.

Of the others Newsblur is pretty Reader like with some cool new features and does work well on the iPad.

I am not liking netvibes as well as you have to do too much with drop down menus.

And I still can’t say with TheOldReader as I am now 2023 in line to import my RSS feeds! Ha! At this rate Google Reader will be down by the time I get to try it out!

And I just don’t like Feedly. I want a list, not pictures and a magazine format. Too much like Flipboard for my taste. I want more control and more speed in my reeder.

I really hope DIggs new Reader is as good and fast as Reader.

MacWorld on why you should use OS X Spaces

A great article on why you should use OS X spaces. I love it personally, though I think you had more control with older versions. And it is especially great for laptops, but I use it to separate power apps on my macpro and couldn’t function without it at this point.

It is now part of Mission Control (though should be it’s own thing). It makes your mac have a virtually bigger space, as if you have a bigger desktop and are only seeing part of it and can set individual apps to different spaces.

Petition to save Google Reader hits 133,000

The petition to save Google Reader at Change.org has reached 133,000. Need less than 17,000 more to hit 150,000! Come on!

Not that I think it will change Google’s mind, but it would be great if they released their source code so someone else could take up where they left off exactly, even with a pay wall, which I think enough of us would pay to make it worth while!

Wacom releases the Cintiq 13HD

Cintiq

Wacom has released the Cintiq 13HD.It is $999. I has a 1920×1080 display that runs off of hdmi and usb, and has a resolution of 5080 lines per inch.

I would so love one of these, but they are just too expensive. I do love the rumor of a Wacom tablet though, as having a portable tablet that is also a Cintiq sounds amazing!

Continued testing of Google Reader Replacements

So I still want Google Reader back, and honestly mostly I have switched back to it along with Reeder on my iPad, but instead of staring items I am sending them to pinboard. And if I had to chose one of the other choices as of right now it would have to be newsblur, though I think it is slow and not nearly as efficient as Reader was.

And as for TheOldReader I can’t really say as I have only moved up to 4830 after what 5 days, so I figure my feeds will import in a couple of weeks and I can give it a go.

Netvibes interface is just not great for an iPad, which is where I mostly read feeds. Maybe with a dedicated app it would be better.

And Feedly I just don’t like the look of it, if they would also have a more reader like view maybe I could go for it. I do find it interesting that they say their user base grew by half a million in one day as of the announcement as that is a huge amount more than the 120,000 who have signed the petition to not kill Google Reader.

Lets hop that Diggs app is good.

Or if Reeder updates feeds itself, and syncs via iCloud as I do have Mac, iPad and iPhone versions. Will not be great for at work as I won’t have an app there, but I could always just use my ipad.

The Guardian says killing Google Reader is like Killing the bees!

The Guardian UK has a great article on why killing Google Reader is like Killing the bees.

Basically RSS never caught on with the internet in general, and it isn’t an easy source of income, and google would of course rather have us use Google+, though it doesn’t work at all the same way.

The thing is the users of Google Reader are power users, and they still drive much more site traffic than Google+ does. And they are the journalists and power users and bloggers. And it is us that drives people to sites, and drives links on sites like Google+ and Facebook, so Google is effectively shooting themselves in the foot without any forward thinking.

I totally agree with the sentiment. It is the same kind of Hubris as Apple giving up on it’s power users without releasing a new MacPro in years! Power users may not themselves be a huge sales market, but they are in fact a huge driver of others users and the internet in general.

And to drive those users away from your services may not hurt in the short run, but it will hurt in the long run. Who of us will trust Google to keep it’s services around? Will Blogger be next? How about Gmail? Calendar? What service will Google drop next? And the more users that leave, the less money Google makes over advertising, and reading their data, and it will make them more irrelevant!

More feature request for Adobe Premiere Pro and Media Encorder CS6

Premiere

So I am delivering a show that was cut in Final Cut Pro, that was cut in 23.976, but needs to be delivered at 29.97, so I was using Adobe Media Encoder to do the conversion, but found I could only do it if I want either a single stereo audio track or a single mono mix-down.

I don’t have the ability to compress a version with dual or more mono tracks (or a stereo and dual mono).

Often I have to deliver shows with a stereo mix, and dual monos one with dialogue, and the other with music and FX, but I can’t do that with Adobe Media Encoder, so I have had to go back to the super slow Apple Compressor to do my compressions.

AME

Not only could Media Encoder us a pass through, so if you have a clip with 4 audio tracks uncompressed, then just re-write it in the new file exactly as it was, but it also needs to at least be able to separate dual mono tracks so you can at least do stems on the textless version.

The other is that Premiere Pro really needs to be able to paste individual attributes of a clip, just like Final Cut Pro 7. Just being able to paste all attributes is less than useless in most cases!

I just brought all of my reels into Premiere Pro from Final Cut Pro 7 because I wanted to use Adobe Encore to make a new DVD and somehow all my clips had there volume put to negative infinite, so I have had to individually raise the volume one each clip, which was an incredible pain.

And yes I have put in Feature requests at Adobe, but I have been putting in the individual attributes since CS 5.0, so I am not holding my breath.